首页> 外文OA文献 >Is the efficacy of biological control against plant diseases likely to be more durable than that of chemical pesticides?
【2h】

Is the efficacy of biological control against plant diseases likely to be more durable than that of chemical pesticides?

机译:生物防治植物病害的功效是否可能比化学农药更持久?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The durability of a control method for plant protection is defined as the persistence of its efficacy in space and time. It depends on (i) the selection pressure exerted by it on populations of plant pathogens and (ii) on the capacity of these pathogens to adapt to the control method. Erosion of effectiveness of conventional plant protection methods has been widely studied in the past. For example, apparition of resistance to chemical pesticides in plant pathogens or pests has been extensively documented. The durability of biological control has often been assumed to be higher than that of chemical control. Results concerning pest management in agricultural systems have shown that this assumption may not always be justified. Resistance of various pests to one or several toxins of Bacillus thuringiensis and apparition of resistance of the codling moth Cydia pomonella to the C. pomonella granulovirus have, for example, been described. In contrast with the situation for pests, the durability of biological control of plant diseases has hardly been studied and no scientific reports proving the loss of efficiency of biological control agents against plant pathogens in practice has been published so far. Knowledge concerning the possible erosion of effectiveness of biological control is essential to ensure a durable efficacy of biological control agents on target plant pathogens. This knowledge will result in identifying risk factors that can foster the selection of strains of plant pathogens resistant to biological control agents. It will also result in identifying types of biological control agents with lower risk of efficacy loss, i.e., modes of action of biological control agents that does not favor the selection of resistant isolates in natural populations of plant pathogens. An analysis of the scientific literature was then conducted to assess the potential for plant pathogens to become resistant to biological control agents.
机译:用于植物保护的控制方法的持久性定义为其有效性在时空上的持久性。它取决于(i)植物对病原体种群施加的选择压力,以及(ii)这些病原体适应控制方法的能力。过去已经广泛研究了常规植物保护方法的有效性侵蚀。例如,已广泛记录了对植物病原体或害虫中化学农药的抗性鉴定。通常认为生物防治的持久性高于化学防治的持久性。有关农业系统有害生物管理的结果表明,这一假设可能并不总是合理的。例如,已经描述了各种害虫对苏云金芽孢杆菌的一种或几种毒素的抗性和对苹果蛾蛾小dia蛾(Cydia pomonella)的抵抗力对鲍氏梭菌颗粒病毒的鉴定。与有害生物的情况相反,几乎没有研究过对植物病害的生物防治的持久性,迄今为止,还没有科学报告证明在实践中丧失了生物防治剂对植物病原体的功效。有关可能削弱生物防治效力的知识对于确保生物防治剂对目标植物病原体的持久效力至关重要。这些知识将导致确定可促进选择对生物防治剂具有抗性的植物病原体菌株的风险因素。这还将导致鉴定出具有较低功效损失风险的生物防治剂的类型,即,不利于在植物病原体的自然种群中选择抗性分离株的生物防治剂的作用方式。然后对科学文献进行分析,以评估植物病原体对生物防治剂产生抗药性的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号